Archive for June, 2010
Massive BMW Recall…
Posted by Jason Adams in Car News on June 29, 2010
It would seem that the recall notices were piling up at BMW’s Motorrad division, leading the company to release safety notices for three separate issues all at once. The largest recall will go to 15,500 owners of BMW’s 2007-2008 K 1200GT; 2007-2009 R 1200 GS, R 1200 GS Adventure, R 1200 R, R 1200 RT and finally 2007 R 1200 ST. That issue involves the front brake line, which could develop stress cracks and eventually leak, leading to the loss of braking performance.
Next up is the 2007 and 2008 G 650 models (X Country, X Moto and X Challenge) for a roll-gear pin that could dislodge and jam itself between the drive chin and rear sprocket. Naturally, that’s not good. And neither would the potential drive chain failure due to improper manufacturing on the 2009 and 2009 F 650 GS and F 800 GS. Both of those problems could either cause an accident or make the bike inoperable until repaired.
[Source: NHTSA]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Component: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Potential Number of Units Affected: 15532 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consequence: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Remedy: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Notes: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
| Component: POWER TRAIN | |||||||||||||||||
| Potential Number of Units Affected: | |||||||||||||||||
| Summary: |
|||||||||||||||||
| Consequence: |
|||||||||||||||||
| Remedy: |
|||||||||||||||||
| Notes: |
|||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Component: POWER TRAIN | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Potential Number of Units Affected: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Consequence: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Remedy: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Notes: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Congress Mulling In-Car Alcohol Detectors
Posted by Jason Adams in Car News on June 29, 2010
The New York Times reports that the U.S. Congress is considering a six-fold increase in the annual funding of in-car devices to detect drunk drivers. The Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety program’s budget would increase from $2 million per year to $12 million for the next five years, likely expediting the development of an effective device.
History suggests that such a device would save thousands of lives. In 2008 alone, nearly 12,000 people died in alcohol-impaired car crashes. Many of those deaths would likely be preventable if there were a way for a vehicle system to seamlessly detect elevated alcohol levels in drivers. Scientists are working on a device that could instantly detect a driver’s blood alcohol level by reading alcohol levels on the breath or use a light beam to assess alcohol levels on the skin.
Program Director Susan Ferguson says that said device should be “very fast, very accurate, highly reliable and precise,” adding that achieving a high level of precision is going to take a lot of money. Ferguson feels that the alcohol detection system could be the safety equivalent of the next seatbelt, suggesting that it could save 8,000 to 9,000 lives per year.
A total of 13 automakers are behind the project as well, and the goal is for drivers to voluntarily add the mechanism to their vehicles as an added safety measure. We’re guessing that adding such a system could greatly reduce the cost to insure the vehicle, giving drivers a financial incentive to add the device. Of course, adding the cost of the device to new cars will likely cost automakers (and in turn, consumers) a fair bit of money, but the hope is that reduced insurance costs could cover the difference.
What do you think, are in-car alcohol detectors a good idea? Cast your vote in our survey below and leave your thoughts in Comments.
Issues With iPhone 4 and Car Stereos
Posted by Jason Adams in Car News on June 29, 2010
We’ve received several tips over the weekend from iOS 4 users who are having trouble connecting to their car stereos. A search of Apple’s discussion boards revealed that they’re not alone.
Here’s what’s going on: A number of stereo units from Pioneer, JVC and others are giving a “device incompatible” message when connected to an iPhone running iOS 4. Note that the 3G and 3GS phones in question worked fine with these stereos when they were on iOS 3.1.3. Of course, the iPhone 4 only runs iOS 4, but since the older phones are also affected it seems likely that this is a software issue, not a hardware one.
Others aren’t getting the incompatibility message, but are seeing weird behavior. For example, everything works fine until a call comes in and then finishes. The song that was playing at the time starts over from the beginning, instead of picking up where it left off. Others report that the iPod app will play music for about 10 seconds and then go silent, even though it says music is still playing.
The issue is spread across manufacturers, so it’s reasonable to point the finger at iOS 4 (unless all these stereo makers missed the same fine print in the iPhone compatibility specifications). If you’ve had the same trouble — or better yet, found a fix — let us know. Here’s hoping a future update takes care of the issue.
Faisal Shahzad Pleads Guilty To Attempting To Blow Up Times Square With Car Bomb
Posted by Jason Adams in Junk Car News on June 22, 2010
NEW YORK — Calling himself a Muslim soldier, a defiant Pakistan-born U.S. citizen pleaded guilty Monday to carrying out the failed Times Square car bombing and left a sinister warning that unless the U.S. leaves Muslim lands alone, “we will be attacking U.S.”
Wearing a white skull cap, prison smocks and a dark beard, Faisal Shahzad entered the plea in U.S. District Court in Manhattan just days after a federal grand jury indicted him on 10 terrorism and weapons counts, some of which carried mandatory life prison sentences. He pleaded guilty to them all.
U.S. District Judge Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum challenged Shahzad repeatedly with questions such as whether he had worried about killing children in Times Square.
“One has to understand where I’m coming from,” Shahzad calmly replied. “I consider myself … a Muslim soldier.”
The 30-year-old described his effort to set off a bomb in an SUV he parked in Times Square on May 1, saying he chose the warm Saturday night because it would be crowded with people he could injure or kill. He said he conspired with the Pakistan Taliban, which provided more than $15,000 to fund his operation.
He explained that he packed his vehicle with three separate bomb components, hoping to set off a fertilizer-fueled bomb packed in a gun cabinet, a set of propane tanks and gas canisters rigged with fireworks to explode into a fireball. He also revealed he was carrying a folding assault rifle for “self-defense.”
Shahzad said he lit a fuse and waited 2 1/2 to five minutes for the bomb to erupt.
“I was waiting to hear a sound but I didn’t hear a sound. … So I walked to Grand Central and went home,” he said.
Shahzad dismissed the judge’s question about the children by saying the U.S. didn’t care when children were killed in Muslim countries.
“It’s a war. I am part of the answer to the U.S. terrorizing the Muslim nations and the Muslim people,” he said. “On behalf of that, I’m revenging the attack. Living in the United States, Americans only care about their people, but they don’t care about the people elsewhere in the world when they die.”
Cedarbaum also asked Shahzad if he understood that the people in Times Square might not have anything to do with what happened overseas.
“The people select the government. We consider them all the same,” Shahzad said during the hour-long hearing.
Shahzad made the plea and an accompanying statement as Cedarbaum began asking him a lengthy series of questions to ensure he understood his rights.
She asked him if he understood some charges carried mandatory life sentences and that he might spend the rest of his life in prison. He said he did.
At one point, she asked him if he was sure he wanted to plead guilty.
He said he wanted “to plead guilty and 100 times more” to let the U.S. know that if it did not get out of Iraq and Afghanistan, halt drone attacks and stop meddling in Muslim lands, “we will be attacking U.S.”
Sentencing was scheduled for Oct. 5.
The Bridgeport, Conn., resident was arrested trying to leave the country May 3, two days after the bomb failed to ignite near a Broadway theater.
Authorities said Shahzad immediately cooperated, delaying his initial court appearance for two weeks as he spilled details of a plot meant to sow terror in the world-famous Times Square on a warm Saturday night when it was packed with thousands of potential victims.
The bomb apparently sputtered, emitting smoke that attracted the attention of an alert street vendor, who notified police, setting in motion a rapid evacuation of blocks of a city still healing from the shock of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attack on the World Trade Center.
According to the indictment issued last week, Shahzad received a total of $12,000 prior to the attack from the Pakistani Taliban through cash drop-offs in Massachusetts and Long Island.
Attorney General Eric Holder said after the plea: “Faisal Shahzad plotted and launched an attack that could have led to serious loss of life, and today the American criminal justice system ensured that he will pay the price for his actions.”
FBI New York Acting Assistant Director-in-Charge George Venizelos called the plea “right on the mark” and praised the work of “ordinary citizens who alerted law enforcement of suspicious activity.”
Shahzad was accused in the indictment of receiving explosives training in Waziristan, Pakistan, during a five-week trip to that country. He returned to the United States in February.
The indictment said he received $5,000 in cash on Feb. 25 from a co-conspirator in Pakistan and $7,000 more on April 10, allegedly sent at the co-conspirator’s direction. Shahzad said in court Monday that the Pakistan Taliban gave him more than $4,000 when he left training camp.
Shahzad, born in Pakistan, moved to the United States when he was 18.
Pakistan has arrested at least 11 people since the attempted attack. An intelligence official has alleged two of them played a role in the plot. No one has been charged.
Three men in Massachusetts and Maine suspected of supplying money to Shahzad have been detained on immigration charges; one was recently transferred to New York.
Federal authorities have said they believe money was channeled through an underground money transfer network known as “hawala,” but they have said they doubt anyone in the U.S. who provided money knew what it was for.
South African Man Killed For Changing TV to World Cup Match
Posted by Jason Adams in Random Junk on June 17, 2010
Associated Press
JOHANNESBURG — Police say a South African man who wanted to watch a World Cup match instead of a religious program was beaten to death by his family in the northeastern part of the country.
David Makoeya, a 61-year-old man from the small village of Makweya, Limpopo province, fought with his wife and two children for the remote control on Sunday because he wanted to watch Germany play Australia in the World Cup. The others, however, wanted to watch a gospel show.
“He said, ‘No, I want to watch soccer,’” police spokesman Mothemane Malefo said Thursday. “That is when the argument came about.
“In that argument, they started assaulting him.”
Malefo said Makoeya got up to change the channel by hand after being refused the remote control and was attacked by his 68-year-old wife Francina and two children, 36-year-old son Collin and 23-year-old daughter Lebogang.
Malefo said he was not sure what the family used to kill Makoeya.
“It appears they banged his head against the wall,” Malefo said. “They phoned the police only after he was badly injured, but by the time the police arrived the man was already dead.”
All three were arrested Sunday night, but Lebogang was released on $200 bail Tuesday, Malefo said. The other two are still being held in custody.
Malefo said the mother and son will reappear in the local Seshego Magistrates Court on July 27.
“He was always a happy man, never violent,” Makoeya’s nieces, Miriam and Anna, told the Daily Sun newspaper. “On Saturday, we saw him the last time at a funeral.”
The World Cup, being played in Africa for the first time, started Friday and runs through July 11. Although most the tickets for the 64-game tournament have been sold, many in South Africa are too poor to attend matches.
Useless Junk Turned Into Creativity
Posted by Jason Adams in Random Junk on June 14, 2010
Courtesy of abduzeedo.com
The following are images of pretty cool items that were part of a pretty cool contest. The Spring Greening Design Competition challenged designers, artists and crafters to transform useless junk into beautiful products, and the result is a list of very interesting and creative pieces. We will show here a list with some of the finalists and the winners of the competition.
You can click on each image to learn more about the piece and it’s designer.
The Finalists

POP Pendant Light Made From Recycled Aluminum Pulltabs

Iluminata: Lamp Made Out of Yogurt Bottles

Chop-Flops Made From Recycled Chopsticks

LOTO Recycled Plastic Bottle Chandeliers

US Map Art Made From Cereal Boxes

La Lata Bowl Made From Recycled Soda Can Tabs

Gorgeous Garments Upcycled from Magnetic Video Tape

National Geographic Magazine Shelf

Potus Pot Made From a Recycled Lightbulb

Cute Stool Made Out of Paper Rolls

Dazzling Lamps Made Out of Soda Bottles

Plastic Lamps made from Recycled Six-Pack Rings

Stunning Chandelier Made Out of Hangers

Cone Light Recycled from Used Traffic Cones

ELASTICSHELF: A Shelving System Made Out of Used Bike Tires

Snack-Serving Robot Made from Vintage Objects

Spice Rack, Vase and Salt and Pepper Shakers Made Out of Light Bulbs!

LAPICERO: Toilet Paper Roll Pencil Holder
Who Are Your Winners?
What Car Thieves Think of the Club
Posted by Jason Adams in Junk Car News on June 8, 2010
In the SuperFreakonomics chapter on global warming, we describe pollution as a negative externality, a cost that is generally borne by someone other than the party producing the waste. In so doing, we discuss the difference between two anti-theft devices for cars, the Club and LoJack. Because LoJack is a hidden device and thieves cannot therefore know which cars have it and which don’t, it cuts down on overall theft. Which means it produces the rare positive externality. The Club, meanwhile, works in the opposite manner:
The Club is big and highly visible (it even comes in neon pink). By using a Club, you are explicitly telling a potential thief that your car will be hard to steal. The implicit signal, meanwhile, is that your neighbor’s car — the one without a Club — is a much better target. So your Club produces a negative externality for your non-Club-using neighbor in the form of a higher risk that his car will be stolen. The Club is a perfect exercise in self-interest.
Having read this passage, a man named Jim Burns wrote in with an interesting background story:
Back in the ’90s, I was working as a design engineer for Chrysler. I had responsibility for key cylinders and door latches. At that time auto theft rates in Europe were increasing and driving the insurers to put pressure on the Euro governments to require increased theft deterrence devices on all new cars. As part of our attempt to figure out where best to invest our design dollars, we hired some professional car thieves to provide a more hands-on perspective than us engineers had (well, maybe not all of us).
At some point, the Club was mentioned. The professional thieves laughed and exchanged knowing glances. What we knew was that the Club is a hardened steel device that attaches to the steering wheel and the brake pedal to prevent steering and/or braking. What we found out was that a pro thief would carry a short piece of a hacksaw blade to cut through the plastic steering wheel in a couple seconds. They were then able to release The Club and use it to apply a huge amount of torque to the steering wheel and break the lock on the steering column (which most cars were already equipped with). The pro thieves actually sought out cars with The Club on them because they didn’t want to carry a long pry bar that was too hard to conceal.
Ah, the beauty of unintended consequences. And do not pass too quickly over the fact that a car company hires car thieves for consultation. If you are a businessperson, do you regularly engage those who wish to do you harm? If you are an intellectual, do you regularly sit down with those who wish to call you names?

STEPHEN J. DUBNER Of New York Times
Chevrolet Launches Nation’s First Electric Car Training Program for First Responders
Posted by Jason Adams in Junk Car News on June 2, 2010
Chevrolet and OnStar announced the formation of the first automaker-sponsored training program to educate the nation’s first responders on how to manage electric vehicles in an accidents.
The announcement is being made by General Motors
in San Francisco jointly with the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF), International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC) and the National Emergency Number Association (NENA).
“We believe a first responder educational program is a needed step toward helping this very important group of life-savers understand electric vehicles in the event of a crash or other emergency,†said Carmen Benavides, director, Chevrolet Safety. “The team at Chevrolet and OnStar along with first responder organizations are taking the lead as we introduce electric vehicles and other advanced technologies to the roads.â€
The inaugural training sessions will take place in Chicago in August at the IAFC’s Fire-Rescue International Conference, and will feature the Chevrolet Volt. Local first responder training workshops will begin to roll out with the car in San Francisco, Los Angles, Detroit, and Washington DC when the Volt sales begin there later this year. Throughout this year Chevrolet has worked with various national first responder representatives from national safety organizations to develop the appropriate training and education materials to be used in these sessions.
The training will include an animation and illustrations of the Chevrolet Volt highlighting locations of high-strength steel, cut points for extrication, first responder labeling, automatic and manual electrical shut-off and more.
The Chevrolet Volt’s safety features include safeguards before, during and, thanks to OnStar, after a crash. Before a crash, the vehicle’s technology helps the driver stay on track with an antilock brake system Stabilitrak and traction control. Additional crash avoidance features include daytime running lamps and hands-free calling capability through OnStar and Bluetooth. During a crash the Volt can reduce injuries with safety cage construction, sensors, crush zones, eight air bags standard and safety belts. And after a crash Chevrolet Volt has the added protection of OnStar which, in certain types of collisions, uses built-in vehicle sensors to automatically alert an OnStar Advisor who is immediately connected into the vehicle and can request emergency help to be sent to its location.
More than 50 crash tests at various speeds and angles have been conducted to date in the development of the Chevrolet Volt, including front, side and rear impacts as well as rollovers. There is extensive use of high strength steel in the body structure in order to achieve outstanding safety performance.
-General Motors
Benavides explains that the Chevy Volt’s high voltage system runs at 360 volts, similar to GMs current 2-mode hybrids which run at 300 volts.  Not much will be different when dealing with the Volt in an accident scenario as compared to hybrids already on the road.
She also explains that just because the Volt has a large lithium-ion battery it doesn’t not behave differently or more dangerously in accidents than conventional cars.  This is a fact GM has verified on its dozens of Volt crash tests to date.  Theses tests have included front, side, and rear collisions as well as  roll-overs and roof crushes.
Woman Hit By Car Sues Google Maps Over Directions
Posted by Jason Adams in Uncategorized on June 1, 2010
A California woman is suing Google after she was hit by a car while following walking directions provided by Google Maps.
Lauren Rosenberg claims Google Maps led her to walk from one Park City, Utah, address to another via Deer Valley Drive, a rural roadway also known as Utah State Route 224. In a lawsuit filed in district court in Park City, Rosenberg claims Google is to blame for a car striking her on the road, an accident she says has cost her $100,000 in medical bills.
“As a direct and proximate cause of Defendant Google’s careless, reckless and negligent providing of unsafe directions, Plaintiff Lauren Rosenberg was led onto a dangerous highway, and was thereby stricken by a motor vehicle, causing her to suffer severe permanent physical, emotional and mental injuries,” the complaint reads.
Rosenberg is asking Google for the cost of her medical bills plus loss of earnings and punitive damages. She is also suing the driver who struck her, Patrick Harwood of Park City.
In the complaint, Rosenberg says Google should not have instructed her to walk along Deer Valley Drive, which does not have sidewalks and pedestrian paths. Rosenberg alleges the roadway “exhibits motor vehicles at high speeds” and “is not reasonably safe for pedestrians.”
Google Maps issues a warning about its walking directions that is visible on PCs but not cell phones or PDAs, saying: “Walking directions are in beta. Use caution — This route may be missing sidewalks or pedestrian paths.”








